Other

Hong Kong IPO disclosure precedents · 10 companies, 10 items

Compliance matters are read from filings since 24 August 2026.

2026-09-28PHIPNon-compliance
Anhui Sinomags Technology Co., Ltd安徽希磁科技股份有限公司

During the Track Record Period, the Petitioner had filed patent invalidation proceedings against 25 patents (the "Disputed Patents").

Business · p. 182

However, following examination of materials submitted by the Petitioner, the Patent Re-examination Department declared 20 patents invalid and two patents partially invalid primarily on the basis of lack of inventiveness.

Business · p. 183

for two of such patents, the Patent Re-examination Department’s decision declaring the patents invalid was upheld by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court at first instance, following which we filed appeals to the Supreme People’s Court, and such appeals remained pending as of the Latest Practicable Date

Business · p. 183
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-09-28ProspectusCompliance confirmed
Beijing ESWIN Computing Technology Co., Ltd.北京奕斯伟计算技术股份有限公司01256.HK

Approximately 10.6% of these projects were subject to obligations arising from the relevant open-source software licenses, which require that if we modify certain software components, the modified source code must also be open sourced.

Business · p. 160

Accordingly, such partial software open-source obligations will not result in negative impact on our research and development, production, or business operations, nor will they lead to the leakage of our technological secrets or impairment of our intellectual property rights.

Business · p. 160
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-09-14ProspectusCompliance confirmed
Shenzhen Forms Syntron Information Co., Ltd.深圳四方精创资讯股份有限公司06700.HK

During the Track Record Period and up to the Latest Practicable Date, we confirm that we have utilized open-source software in the PRC in compliance with the relevant license terms as follows: (a) our use is limited to compression, development, database and debugging tools as auxiliary development tools, without any modification, resale, lease or secondary distribution

Business · p. 153
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-09-11Application ProofCompliance confirmed
ASR MICROELECTRONICS CO., LTD.翱捷科技股份有限公司

As advised by our PRC Legal Advisor, during the Track Record Period and up to the Latest Practicable Date, we had complied with all PRC applicable intellectual property laws and regulations in all material respects.

Business · p. 156

As of June 30, 2026, we had 246 registered patents, 46 trademarks, 21 software copyrights, 161 integrated circuit layout design rights and one domain name registered in the PRC.

Business · p. 156
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-08-31ProspectusCompliance confirmed
Excelland Robotics (Wuxi) Co. Ltd.优地机器人(无锡)股份有限公司03231.HK

As advised by our PRC Legal Adviser, under the relevant agreements and statement, although our rights are non-exclusive, we have rights to use the Vision Perception Algorithm, source code and SDK software.

Business · p. 175

As further advised by our PRC Legal Adviser, there is no material legal impediment to our Group's use of the Vision Perception Algorithm and the related source code.

Business · p. 175
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-08-28Application ProofCompliance confirmed

Based on the FTO Analysis, our Directors are of the view that there are no valid and enforceable patents of any third party in China and the U.S. covering the amino acid sequences or indications currently under development of our Core Products and we have not infringed any valid and enforceable patents or other IP rights of any third parties.

Business · p. 212

No valid claims of third party patents in the U.S. and the PRC that are infringed by FT-002 or FT-003 have been identified.

Business · p. 211
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-08-28Application ProofCompliance confirmed
VivaVision Biotech (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.维眸生物科技(浙江)股份有限公司

We have engaged our PRC IP Counsel and U.S. IP Counsel to carry out freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses with respect to our Core Products.

Business · p. 212

Based on the FTO analyses, we were not aware of any issued patents that may affect our rights to conduct research and development or commercialization of our Core Products in China and the United States as of the Latest Practicable Date.

Business · p. 212

Directors are of the view that we have maintained sufficient intellectual property protection for our Core Products and product candidates, as well as their associated technologies, and had not infringed any third-party intellectual property rights during the Track Record Period and up to the Latest Practicable Date.

Business · p. 213
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters
2026-08-28Application ProofCompliance confirmed
Nanjing Novlead Biotechnology Co., Ltd.南京诺令生物科技股份有限公司

Based on the freedom-to-operate (“FTO”) analysis, as of August 18, 2026, there is no substantial risk of infringement of valid and enforceable issued patents of any third party in the Chinese mainland, Europe and the U.S. that may impact the development and commercialization of our Core Product in the Chinese mainland, Europe and the U.S.

Business · p. 191
The company's explanation, the adviser's view and the page in the filing: see Matters

Tell us