商标及不正当竞争纠纷

港股IPO招股书披露先例 · 2 家公司,2 项

商标及不正当竞争纠纷,通常指公司名称、产品或营销中使用商标或商号而引发的争议,包括以不正当竞争为由提出的索赔。招股书一般于风险因素、业务、概要及财务资料等章节披露诉讼进展、索赔金额及程序动态。申请人通常附上中国知识产权法律顾问关于败诉风险较低的意见,或说明已达成和解、款项付清且调解书未认定构成侵权,作为解释或整改。

合规类事项自 2026 年 8 月 24 日起递交的文件开始收录。

2026-08-28Application Proof不合规事项

上海嘉因提起商标侵权及不正当竞争诉讼

On March 27, 2026, Shanghai Jiayin Biotechnology Co., Ltd.(上海嘉因生物科技有限公司) (the “Shanghai Jiayin”) filed a lawsuit with the Intermediate People's Court of Suzhou Municipality, Jiangsu Province (the “Suzhou Court”), alleging that the inclusion of the words “嘉因” and “嘉因生物” in the enterprise name of Hangzhou Jiayin constitutes trademark infringement and unfair competition, and seeking damages of RMB60.0 million.

Business · 第 207 页

On July 13, 2026, we submitted an objection to jurisdiction to the Suzhou Court, requesting that the case be transferred to the Intermediate People's Court of Hangzhou Municipality for trial.

Business · 第 207 页

Our PRC legal adviser with respect to intellectual property laws in the PRC is of the view that the infringement claims asserted by Shanghai Jiayin are without merit, and that the risk of our being required to pay RMB60.0 million in damages in connection with such alleged infringement is remote.

Business · 第 207 页
公司的解释、律师意见及原文页码定位:在 Matters 中查看
2026-08-25Application Proof不合规事项
山东卓创资讯股份有限公司Sublime China Information Co., Ltd.

被诉不正当竞争及商标侵权已和解

In August 2020, Shanghai Nonferrous Network Information Technology Co., Ltd.* (上海有色網信息科技股份有限公司) (“Shanghai Nonferrous Network”) (as plaintiff), a PRC company with a registered capital of RMB12 million as at the Latest Practicable Date who is a comprehensive service provider in the non-ferrous metals industry, offering benchmark prices, analysis, information, and other services in the metals and mining sector, filed an alleged unfair competition and trademark infringement claim against our Company and our Shanghai branch.

Business · 第 167 页

However, taking into account that (1) as a commodity information service provider, we attach great importance to a healthy competitive relationship with companies in the same industry; (2) to avoid the possible prolonged court procedures; and (3) to reduce media attention, we opted for and undergone a mediation with the plaintiff under the direction of a judge on 20 May 2022 and have reached a settlement arrangement with the plaintiff at a settlement amount of approximately RMB4.0 million (the “Settlement Arrangement”).

Business · 第 167 页
公司的解释、律师意见及原文页码定位:在 Matters 中查看

Tell us